At an International Cinema lecture, French professor Anca Sprenger looked beyond Babette’s Feast as a masterpiece of culinary cinema and pointed to other elements of the film that have made it the work of cinematic art it is today.
PROVO, Utah (March 10, 2015)—Though watching Babette’s Feast will unfortunately not feed your body, it will at least feed your soul. French professor Anca Sprenger discussed the subtle but important messages about sacrifice, gifts and revenge that appear in the 1987 Danish and French film Babette’s Feast at an International Cinema lecture, showing that it was perhaps less about food and more about art.
“Babette’s Feast is one of the rare movies that almost everybody likes,” said Sprenger. “Even the current pope loves this movie, but after my presentation, we will decide if he likes it for the right reasons.”
Babette’s Feast was created in 1987 by Gabriel Axel, a Danish film director and writer. The film was based on a story originally written by Karen Blixen (also known by her pen name Isak Dinesen), a Danish author best known for her controversial memoir Out of Africa.
Babette’s Feast was initially screened at the Cannes Film Festival in France, later going on to win the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film that same year.
Sprenger explained that the film is set in an isolated village in Jutland, Denmark, where a minister has founded a religious sect defined by its austerity. He lives with his two daughters, Martina and Philippa, who are sought after by many suitors for their remarkable beauty. The minister is very protective of his daughters, however, and does not wish for them to marry, claiming that nobody should deprive him of his two “hands.”
Sprenger continued that when French opera singer Achille Papin arrives in Jutland he falls in love with Philippa’s voice, trying to convince her to come back to Paris with him and become an opera star. To her father’s delight she rejects him, and the dejected Papin goes back to France.
“Many years later this French chef named Babette arrives,” Sprenger said. “She’s sent by the opera singer who explains in a letter that she needs shelter because she had to run away from the bloody mess that was happening during the 1871 Paris Commune in France.”
“This has been considered a food movie, which explains my presence here,” Sprenger joked. She said there are even restaurants in France and other countries that are still working on replicating the incredible dinner that Babette prepares in the film, the menu itself becoming a work of art.
However, though the film is largely known for its artful representation of food, Sprenger said there are other directions in which to take the movie as well.
She continued, “We’re also dealing with a religious community, as well as the confrontation of two religions: Babette and Papin who are Catholic, and then this Protestant sect.”
Sprenger emphasized the element of sacrifice that is explored throughout the film. She said that when Babette wins the lottery she uses all of her money to provide a fancy dinner for the people in this religious sect who may not even appreciate it.
“Even worse, the people in the sect decide not to show any sign of gratefulness or enjoyment as they eat this dinner,” Sprenger added. “Their rule was austerity.”
Sprenger asked who was more Christian: Babette or the sect. She suggested that the film represents the opposition between preaching and living religion. The Protestant sect shows austerity by deciding not to express enjoyment or gratitude for the feast, yet Babette uses everything she owns to create a luxurious dinner.
Sprenger also considered the element of the artist in the film. Babette and Papin both define themselves as artists: Babette as a chef and Papin as an opera singer. “One may wonder about the place of art in such a community where nobody seems to care about anything except basic life,” she said.
She continued, “You can also think of the artist’s vengeance. The question that you may ask is, which artist? Are we talking about Babette or are we talking about Papin?”
Sprenger explained that Papin tried to seduce Philippa through his art but was rejected. She underscored the significance of the fact that Papin tried to seduce Philippa when the two sang a duet from Mozart’s Don Giovanni. In this opera, Don Giovanni, the great seducer, challenges the statue of the dead Commendatore, donna Elvira’s father, to come to a feast he was offering. The figure of the dead father comes to the feast and throws Don Giovanni into the flames of hell, Sprenger said.
In Babette’s feast, however, it is almost as if the memory of the dead minister was sent to the flames of hell, since the small congregation is enjoying the feast more and more, Sprenger added. They gradually ignore the absurd rules of austerity and find happiness and love thanks to Babette’s culinary art. In the end it is Papin who triumphs through this feast, appearing as a vengeful Don Giovanni.
She added that Papin probably knew what he was doing when he sent Babette to the two sisters as a gift, arguing that perhaps it was his form of revenge for being rejected.
“It’s funny because in Danish ‘gift’ means ‘poison,’” Sprenger said. “It is just a coincidence, but Babette could be a poisoned gift because she will make these people realize that maybe there’s something wrong about them. Maybe there’s something wrong about all these years of austerity inflicted by their minister.”
She added, however, that Babette is also a wonderful gift because they get to enjoy things they have never experienced before. Sprenger said that you can see the people in the sect become happier as they eat the feast, but in this happiness, there are doubts and regrets that come with it.
“I don’t want to get too much into theory so that you lose your appetite, but the idea of a poisoned gift could be linked with French philosopher Derrida,” Sprenger said. “He talks about writing as a remedy and a poison. I would say that with Babette’s feast this wonderful dinner is a remedy and a poison too because nothing will be the same after they have this dinner.”
Sprenger continued that as a result of Babette’s feast people would probably start doubting the rules and the life their minister brought to them. The seducer, she argued, does not suffer the final punishment. Perhaps it is Papin, the seducer who could not seduce, who gets the last word.
Sprenger concluded, “Look for these elements, look for clues, and try to decide if this was Babette’s victory, sacrifice or revenge, and if there are any winners in this movie, who won.”
—Sylvia Cutler (B.A. English/French ’17)
For more information about upcoming films, visit International Cinema’s website.